Spam and phishing in Q1 2020 – 10 minute mail

Quarterly highlights

Don’t get burned

Burning Man is one of the most eagerly awaited events among fans of spectacular performance and installation art. The main obstacle to attending is the price of admission: a standard ticket will set you back $475, the number is limited, and the buying process is a challenge all by itself (there are several stages, registration data must be entered at a specific time, and if something goes wrong you might not get a second chance). Therefore, half-price fake tickets make for excellent bait.

Scammers tried to make their website as close as possible to the original — even the page with the ticket description looked genuine.

There were just three major differences from the original: only the main page and the ticket purchase section were actually operational, tickets were “sold” without prior registration, and the price was a steal ($225 versus $475).

Oscar-winning scammers

February 2020 saw the 92nd Academy Awards ceremony. Even before the big night, websites were popping up offering free viewings of all the nominated films. Fraudsters targeted users eager to see the short-listed movies before the presentation of the awards.

To promote these sites, Twitter accounts were created — one for each nominated film.

Curious users were invited to visit the resource, where they were shown the first few minutes before being asked to register to continue watching.

During registration, the victim was prompted to enter their bank card details, allegedly to confirm their region of residence. Unsurprisingly, a short while later a certain amount of money disappeared from their account, and the movie did not resume.

Users should be alert to the use of short links in posts on social networks. Scammers often use them because it’s impossible to see where a shortened URL points without actually following it.

There are special services that let you check what lies behind such links, often with an additional bonus in the form of a verdict on the safety of the website content. It is important to do a proper check on links from untrusted sources.

ID for hire

US companies that leak customer data can be heavily fined by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). For example, in 2019 Facebook was slapped with a $5 billion penalty; however, users whose data got stolen do not receive any compensation. This is what scammers decided to exploit by sending a fake e-mail offering compensation from the non-existent Personal Data Protection Fund, created by the equally fictitious US Trading Commission.

Inspired by the idea of services for checking accounts for leaks, the cybercriminals decided to create their own. Visitors were invited to check whether their account details had been stolen, and if so (the answer was “yes” even if the input was gibberish), they were promised compensation “for the leakage of personal data.”

To receive “compensation,” the victim’s citizenship was of no consequence — what mattered was their first name, last name, phone number, and social network accounts. For extra authenticity, a warning message about the serious consequences of using other people’s data to claim compensation popped up obsessively on the page.

To receive the payment, US citizens were asked to enter their Social Security Number (SSN). Everyone else had to check the box next to the words “I’am don’t have SSN” (the mistakes are a good indicator of a fake), whereupon they were invited to “rent” an SSN for $9. Interestingly, even if the user already had an SSN, they were still pestered to get another one.

After that, the potential victim was redirected to a payment page with the amount and currency based on the user’s location. For instance, users in Russia were asked to pay in rubles.

The scam deployed the conventional scheme (especially common in the Runet) of asking the victim to pay a small commission or down payment for the promise of something much bigger. In Q1, 14,725,643 attempts to redirect users to such websites were blocked.

Disaster and pandemic

Fires in Australia

The natural disaster that hit the Australian continent was another get-rich opportunity for scammers. For example, one “Nigerian prince”-style e-mail scam reported that a millionaire dying of cancer was ready to donate her money to save the Australian forests. The victim was asked to help withdraw the funds from the dying woman’s account by paying a fee or making a small contribution to pay for the services of a lawyer, for which they would be rewarded handsomely at a later date.

Besides the fictional millionaire, other “nature lovers” were keen to help out — their e-mails were more concise, but the scheme was essentially the same.


“Nigerian prince” scheme

COVID-19 was (and continues to be) a boon to scammers: non-existent philanthropists and dying millionaires are popping up everywhere offering rewards for help to withdraw funds supposedly for humanitarian purpsoses. Some recipients were even invited to help finance the production of a miracle vaccine, or take part in a charity lottery, the proceeds of which, it was said, would be distributed to poor people affected by the pandemic.

Bitcoin for coronavirus

Having introduced themselves as members of a healthcare organization, the scammers appealed to the victim to transfer a certain sum to the Bitcoin wallet specified in the message. The donation would allegedly go toward fighting the coronavirus outbreak and developing a vaccine, as well as helping victims of the pandemic.

In one e-mail, the attackers played on people’s fear of contracting COVID-19: the message was from an unnamed “neighbor” claiming to be dying from the virus and threatening to infect the recipient unless the latter paid a ransom (which, it was said, would help provide a comfortable old age for the ransomer’s parents).

Dangerous advice from the WHO

One fraudulent mailing disguised as a WHO newsletter offered tips about staying safe from COVID-19.

To get the information, the recipient had to click a link pointing to a fake WHO website. The design was so close to the original that only the URL gave away the scam. The cybercriminals were after login credentials for accounts on the official WHO site. Whereas in the first mailings only a username and password were asked for, in later ones a phone number was also requested.

In addition, we detected several e-mails supposedly from the WHO containing documents with malware. The recipient was asked to open the attachment (in DOC or PDF format), which allegedly offered coronavirus prevention advice. For example, this message contained Backdoor.Win32.Androm.tvmf:

There were other, less elaborate mailings with harmful attachments, including ones containing Trojan-Spy.Win32.Noon.gen:


Corporate segment

The coronavirus topic was also exploited in attacks on the corporate sector. For example, COVID-19 was cited in fraudulent e-mails as a reason for delayed shipments or the need to reorder. The authors marked the e-mails as urgent and required to check attached files immediately.

Another mailing prompted recipients to check whether their company was in a list of firms whose activities were suspended due to the pandemic. After which it asked for a form to be filled out, otherwise the company could be shut down. Both the list of companies and the form were allegedly in the archives attached to the message. In actual fact, the attachments contained Trojan-PSW.MSIL.Agensla.a:

We also registered a phishing attack on corporate users. On a fake page, visitors were invited to monitor the coronavirus situation across the world using a special resource, for which the username and password of the victim’s corporate mail account were required.

Government compensation

The introduction of measures to counter the pandemic put many people in a difficult financial situation. Forced downtime in many industries has had a negative impact on financial well-being. In this climate, websites offering compensation from the government pose a particular danger.

One such popular scheme was highlighted by a colleague of ours from Brazil. A WhatsApp messages about financial or food assistance were sent that appeared to come from a supermarket, bank, or government department. To receive the aid, the victim had to fill out the attached form and share the message with a certain number of contacts. After the form was filled out, the data was sent to the cybercriminals, while the victim got redirected to a page with advertising, a phishing site, a site offering a paid SMS subscription, or similar.

Given that the number of fake sites offering government handouts seems likely only to increase, we urge caution when it comes to promises of compensation or material assistance.

Anti-coronavirus protection with home delivery

Due to the pandemic, demand for antiseptics and antiviral agents has spiked. We registered a large number of mailings with offers to buy antibacterial masks.

In Latin America, WhatsApp mass messages were used to invite people to take part in a prize draw for hand sanitizer products from the brewing company Ambev. The company has indeed started making antiseptics and hand gel, but exclusively for public hospitals, so the giveaway was evidently the work of fraudsters.

The number of fake sites offering folk remedies for the treatment of coronavirus, drugs to strengthen the immune system, and non-contact thermometers and test kits has also risen sharply. Most of the products on offer have no kind of certification whatsoever.

On average, the daily share of e-mails mentioning COVID-19 in Q1 amounted to around 6% of all junk traffic. More than 50% of coronavirus-related spam was in the English language. We anticipate that the number of phishing sites and pandemic-related scams will only increase, and that cybercriminals will use new attack schemes and strategies.

Statistics: spam

Proportion of spam in mail traffic

Proportion of spam in global mail traffic, Q4 2019 – Q1 2020 (download)

In Q1 2020, the largest share of spam was recorded in January (55.76%). The average percentage of spam in global mail traffic was 54.61%, down 1.58 p.p. against the previous reporting period.

Proportion of spam in Runet mail traffic, Q4 2019 – Q1 2020 (download)

In Q1, the share of spam in Runet traffic (the Russian segment of the Internet) likewise peaked in January (52.08%). At the same time, the average indicator, as in Q4 2019, remains slightly lower than the global average (by 3.20 p.p.).

Sources of spam by country


Sources of spam by country, Q1 2020 (download)

In Q1 2020, Russia led the TOP 5 countries by amount of outgoing spam. It accounted for 20.74% of all junk traffic. In second place came the US (9.64%), followed by Germany (9.41%) just 0.23 p.p. behind. Fourth place goes to France (6.29%) and fifth to China (5.22%), which is usually a TOP 3 spam source.

Brazil (3.56%) and the Netherlands (3.38%) took sixth and seventh positions, respectively, followed by Vietnam (2.55%), with Spain (2.34%) and Poland (2.21%) close on its heels in ninth and tenth.

Spam e-mail size


Spam e-mail size, Q4 2019 – Q1 2020 (download)

Compared to Q4 2019, the share of very small e-mails (up to 2 KB) in Q1 2020 fell by more than 6 p.p. and amounted to 59.90%. The proportion of e-mails sized 5-10 KB grew slightly (by 0.72 p.p.) against the previous quarter to 5.56%.

Meanwhile, the share of 10-20 KB e-mails climbed by 3.32 p.p. to 6.36%. The number of large e-mails (100–200 KB) also posted growth (+2.70 p.p.). Their slice in Q1 2020 was 4.50%.

Malicious attachments in e-mail


Number of Mail Anti-Virus triggerings, Q4 2019 – Q1 2020 (download)

In Q1 2020, our security solutions detected a total of 49,562,670 malicious e-mail attachments, which is almost identical to the figure for the last reporting period (there were just 314,862 more malicious attachments detected in Q4 2019).

TOP 10 malicious attachments in mail traffic, Q1 2020 (download)

In Q1, first place in terms of prevalence in mail traffic went to Trojan.Win32.Agentb.gen (12.35%), followed by Exploit.MSOffice.CVE-2017-11882.gen (7.94%) in second and Worm.Win32.WBVB.vam (4.19%) in third.

TOP 10 malicious families in mail traffic, Q1 2020 (download)

As regards malware families, the most widespread this quarter was Trojan.Win32.Agentb (12.51%), with Exploit.MSOffice.CVE-2017-11882 (7.98%), whose members exploit a vulnerability in Microsoft Equation Editor, in second place and Worm.Win32.wbvb (4.65%) in third.

Countries targeted by malicious mailshots


Distribution of Mail Anti-Virus triggerings by country, Q1 2020 (download)

First place by number of Mail Anti-Virus triggerings in Q1 2020 was claimed by Spain. This country accounted for 9.66% of all users of Kaspersky security solutions who encountered e-mail malware worldwide. Second place went to Germany (8.53%), and Russia (6.26%) took bronze.

Statistics: phishing

In Q1 2020, the Anti-Phishing system prevented 119,115,577 attempts to redirect users to scam websites. The percentage of unique attacked users was 8.80% of the total number of users of Kaspersky products in the world.

Attack geography

The country with the largest proportion of users attacked by phishers, not for the first time, was Venezuela (20.53%).

Geography of phishing attacks, Q1 2020 (download)

In second place, by a margin of 5.58 p.p., was Brazil (14.95%), another country that is no stranger to the TOP 3. Next came Australia (13.71%), trailing by just 1.24 p.p.

Country %*
Venezuela 20.53%
Brazil 14.95%
Australia 13.71%
Portugal 12.98%
Algeria 12.12%
France 11.71%
Honduras 11.62%
Greece 11.58%
Myanmar 11.54%
Tunisia 11.53%

* Share of users on whose computers Anti-Phishing was triggered out of all Kaspersky users in the country

Organizations under attack

The rating of attacks by phishers on different categories of organizations is based on detections by Kaspersky products Anti-Phishing component. This component detects pages with phishing content that the user gets redirected to. It does not matter whether the redirect is the result of clicking a link in a phishing e-mail or in a message on a social network, or the result of a malicious program activity. When the component is triggered, a banner is displayed in the browser warning the user about a potential threat.

The largest share of phishing attacks in Q1 2020 fell to the Online Stores category (18.12%). Second place went to Global Internet Portals (16.44%), while Social Networks (13.07%) came in third.

Distribution of organizations affected by phishing attacks by category, Q1 2020 (download)

As for the Banks category, a TOP 3 veteran, this time it placed fourth with 10.95%.


Glancing at the results of Q1 2020, we anticipate that the COVID-19 topic will continue to be actively used by cybercriminals for the foreseeable future. To attract potential victims, the pandemic will be mentioned even on “standard” fake pages and in spam mailings.

The topic is also used extensively in fraudulent schemes offering compensation and material assistance.

It is highly likely that this type of fraud will become more frequent.

The average share of spam in global mail traffic (54.61%) this quarter decreased by 1.58 p.p. against the previous reporting period, while the number of attempted redirects totaled nearly 120 million.

Top of this quarter’s list of spam-source countries is Russia, with a share of 20.74%. Our security solutions blocked 49,562,670 malicious mail attachments, while the most common mail-based malware family, with a 12.35% share of mail traffic, was Trojan.Win32.Agentb.gen.

Temp Mails ( is a new free temporary email addresses service. This service provide you random 10 minutes emails addresses. It is also known by names like: temporary mail, disposable mail, throwaway email, one time mail, anonymous email address… All emails received by Tempmail servers are displayed automatically in your online browser inbox.

Hiding in plain sight: PhantomLance walks into a market – 10 minute mail

In July 2019, Dr. Web reported about a backdoor trojan in Google Play, which appeared to be sophisticated and unlike common malware often uploaded for stealing victims’ money or displaying ads. So, we conducted an inquiry of our own, discovering a long-term campaign, which we dubbed “PhantomLance”, its earliest registered domain dating back to December 2015. We found dozens of related samples that had been appearing in the wild since 2016 and had been deployed in various application marketplaces including Google Play. One of the latest samples was published on the official Android market on November 6, 2019. We informed Google of the malware, and it was removed from the market shortly after.

The latest example of spyware in Google Play disguised as a browser cleaner

During our investigation, we discovered various overlaps with reported OceanLotus APT campaigns. Thus, we found multiple code similarities with the previous Android campaign, as well as macOS backdoors, infrastructure overlaps with Windows backdoors and a few cross-platform resemblances.

Besides the attribution details, this document describes the actors’ spreading strategy, their techniques for bypassing app market filters, malware version diversity and the latest sample deployed in 2020, which uses Firebase to decrypt the malicious payload.

Our report is broken down into several sections.

  1. Malware versions – technical description of versions found, their features and relationships between them.
  2. Spread – information on specific tactics used by the threat actors for distributing their malware.
  3. Infrastructure – further details on uncovered infrastructure pieces as well as overlaps found.
  4. Victimology – thoughts on the actors’ interests in choosing their targets.
  5. Overlaps with previous campaigns – details of similarities with all related campaigns that we have identified.

More information on PhantomLance is available to customers of Kaspersky Intelligence Reporting. For more information, contact [email protected]

Malware versions

For the purposes of the research, we divided samples we found into a series of “versions” based on technical complexity: from the basic Version 1 to the highly sophisticated Version 3. Note that they do not fully correlate with the chronological order of their appearance ITW: for example, we observed Version 1 samples in late 2019 and in 2017, the year that we also saw Version 3.

Functionality of all samples are similar – the main purpose of spyware was to gather sensitive information. While the basic functionality was not very broad, and included geolocation, call logs, contact access and SMS access, the application could also gather a list of installed applications, as well as device information, such as model and OS version. Furthermore, the threat actor was able to download and execute various malicious payloads, thus, adapting the payload that would be suitable to the specific device environment, such as Android version and installed apps. This way the actor is able to avoid overloading the application with unnecessary features and at the same time gather information needed.

Version 1

We attribute the latest Google Play sample (MD5: 2e06bbc26611305b28b40349a600f95c) to this version. This is a clear payload, and unlike the other versions, it does not drop an additional executable file. Our main theory about the reasons for all these versioning maneuvers is that the attackers are trying to use diverse techniques to achieve their key goal, to bypass the official Google marketplace filters. And achieve it they did, as even this version passed Google’s filters and was uploaded to Google Play Store in 2019 (see Spreading for details).

No suspicious permissions are mentioned in the manifest file; instead, they are requested dynamically and hidden inside the dex executable. This seems to be a further attempt at circumventing security filtering. In addition to that, there is a feature that we have not seen before: if the root privileges are accessible on the device, the malware can use a reflection call to the undocumented API function “setUidMode” to get permissions it needs without user involvement.

Note that this trick only works with Android SDK version 19 or higher.

Most of the aforementioned operations naturally require root access, but we believe that the root exploit may be delivered as payload in a server response to collected device info. Also, some of the applications that the malware mimics will have notified the user that they only work on rooted devices. For instance, Browser Cleaner can only clean up the browser cache if it is given root permissions.

Version 2

Specimens of this version were also detected in 2019 and earlier. One of the samples was located in Google Play Store in November 2019 and described in the Dr. Web blog. Based on our detection statistics and spotted version stamps, we believe that this version is a replacement for Version 3, which we did not observe in 2019.

Below are the most valuable points and main differences from the Version 1.

The malicious payload APK is now packed in an encrypted file in the assets directory and is decrypted by the first stage using an AES algorithm. A decryption key and initialization vector (IV) are located in the first 32 + 16 bytes of the encrypted payload.

After decryption, the asset file will look like this.

As you can see, before the APK magic, the file header contains strings that are used for making further reflection calls to payload methods. Here is the first-stage code fragment with explanations regarding the payload loading process.

All Version 2 payloads use the same package name, “”, which probably mimics the official Google Play Games package, “”.

Moreover, we spotted developer version stamps in decrypted payloads.

MD5 Developer version stamp
65d399e6a77acf7e63ba771877f96f8e 5.10.6084
6bf9b834d841b13348851f2dc033773e 5.10.6090
8d5c64fdaae76bb74831c0543a7865c3 5.10.9018
3285ae59877c6241200f784b62531694 5.10.9018
e648a2cc826707aec33208408b882e31 5.10.9018

It is worth mentioning payload manifests, which do not contain any permission requests. As stated in the description of Version 1, permissions required by the malicious features are granted via an undocumented Android API.

We have found two different certificates used for signing Version 2 payloads.

MD5 Certificate
6bf9b834d841b13348851f2dc033773e Serial Number: 0xa4ed88e620b8262e

Issuer: CN=Lotvolron

Validity: from = Wed Jan 20 11:30:49 MSK 2010

8d5c64fdaae76bb74831c0543a7865c3 Serial Number: 0xd47c08706d440384

Issuer: CN=Ventoplex

Validity: from = Wed Apr 13 05:21:26 MSK 2011


Although validity dates look spoofed in both cases and do not point to any real deployment times, by analyzing all payload certificates, we discovered that the second one (Ventoplex) was used to sign Version 3 payloads as well.

Version 2.1

The latest samples of PhantomLance discovered in the early 2020 introduced a new technique for decrypting payloads: the malicious payload was shipped with its dropper, encrypted with AES. The key is not stored anywhere in the dropper itself but sent to the device using Google’s Firebase remote config system. The other technical features are very similar to the ones we observed in Version 2, so we tagged this generation as Version 2.1.

We were able to make a valid request to PhantomLance’s Firebase API. The response consisted of a JSON struct containing the AES decryption key, where the “code_disable” value is the decryption key for payload.

What is important, the dropper expects that the AES decryption key will be stored in a parameter named “code”, so this specific variant should not function properly. Besides, we noticed that Firebase previously returned one more field, named “conf_disable”, which has the same value as the “code_disable”, so we assume that the actors are still tinkering with this new feature.

Another interesting technique that the actors are trying to implement is a third-stage payload implant. The second-stage payload (MD5: 83cd59e3ed1ba15f7a8cadfe9183e156) contains an APK file named “data” (MD5: 7048d56d923e049ca7f3d97fb5ba9812) with a corrupted header in the assets path.

The second stage reads this APK file, decrypts it and rewrites its first 27 bytes as described below.

This results in an APK file (MD5: c399d93146f3d12feb32da23b75304ba) that appears to be a typical PhantomLance payload configured with already known C2 servers (cloud.anofrio[.]com, video.viodger[.]com, api.anaehler[.]com). This third-stage APK is deployed with a custom native library named “data.raw”, also stored at the assets path. This library is used for achieving persistence on the infected device and appears to be a custom daemonized ELF executable based on the open-source “daemon.c” Superuser tool component, while in previous samples, we saw MarsDaemon used for this purpose.

Code comparison of the library used to daemonize the third stage payload with daemon.c source code hosted on Github

Version 3

While we have found that Version 2 has been used as a replacement for this one, as we have not observed any new deployments of Version 3 in 2019, it still looks more advanced in terms of technical details than Version 2. According to our detection statistics and deployment dates on application markets, Version 3 was active at least from 2016 to 2018.

Below are the most valuable points and main differences between Version 3 and Version 2.

The first-stage dropper appears even more obfuscated than that in Version 2; it uses a similar way of decrypting the payload, but it has minor differences. The encrypted content is split into multiple asset files under 10256 bytes in size plus an encrypted config file, and contains payload decryption details.

Below is the payload decryption sequence.

  1. Decrypt the payload config file from the assets with both a hardcoded name and AES key.
  2. Read the following values from the decrypted payload config file in this order:
    • AES key for APK payload decryption
    • Class and method names for reflection calls to the payload
    • MD5 for APK payload integrity check
    • Number and names of the split APK payload parts
  3. Decrypt the APK payload header hardcoded in the first stage with the AES key from the payload config. Write it to the APK payload file.
  4. Using decrypted names of the split payload parts, decrypt their content and append them to the APK payload file one by one.
  5. Check the integrity of the resulting APK payload file by comparing with the MD5 value decrypted from the payload config.
  6. Load and run the APK payload.

The following reversed code fragment represents the actual payload decryption process.

Each Version 3 payload has the same package name, “”, and is signed with the same certificate (CN=Ventoplex), used to sign some of the Version 2 payloads.

The only developer version stamp that we have found in Version 3 payloads is “10.2.98”.

Another notable finding is the 243e2c6433815f2ecc204ada4821e7d6 sample, which we believe belongs to a Version 3 payload. However, no related dropper has been spotted in the wild, and unlike the other payloads, it is signed with a debug certificate and not obfuscated at all, revealing all variable/class/method names and even BuildConfig values. Our guess that this is a debug developer version that somehow got leaked.

As a conclusion to this technical review, it is worth saying that all payloads across the different versions, even Version 1, which is in fact a clear payload without a dropper, share a code structure and locations where sensitive strings, such as С2 addresses, are stored.


The main spreading vector used by the threat actors is distribution through application marketplaces. Apart from the com.zimice.browserturbo, which we have reported to Google, and  com.physlane.opengl, reported by Dr. Web, we have observed tracks indicating that many malicious applications were deployed to Google Play in the past and have now been removed.

These search results contain a link to already-removed malware in Google Play

Some of the applications whose appearance in Google Play we can confirm.

Package name Google Play persistence date (at least)
com.zimice.browserturbo 2019-11-06
com.physlane.opengl 2019-07-10
com.unianin.adsskipper 2018-12-26
com.codedexon.prayerbook 2018-08-20 2018-08-20 2018-08-20
com.zonjob.browsercleaner 2018-08-20
com.linevialab.ffont 2018-08-20

Besides, we have identified multiple third-party marketplaces that, unlike Google Play, still host the malicious applications, such as https://apkcombo[.]com, https://apk[.]support/, https://apkpure[.]com, https://apkpourandroid[.]com and many others.

Example of a malicious application with a description in Vietnamese that is still available in a third-party marketplace (hxxps://androidappsapk[.]co/detail-cham-soc-be-yeu-babycare/)

In nearly every case of malware deployment, the threat actors try to build a fake developer profile by creating a Github account that contains only a fake end-user license agreement (EULA). An example is the one below, reported by us to Google.

This Google Play page contains a fake developer email

 Here is a related Github account with the same handle, registered on October 17, 2019.

A Github profile that is part of the fake developer identity

The account contains only one report with one file described as some type of EULA.

During our extensive investigation, we spotted a certain tactic often used by the threat actors for distributing their malware. The initial versions of applications uploaded to app marketplaces did not contain any malicious payloads or code for dropping a payload. These versions were accepted because they contained nothing suspicious, but follow-up versions were updated with both malicious payloads and code to drop and execute these payloads. We were able to confirm this behavior in all of the samples, and we were able to find two versions of the applications, with and without a payload.

An example of this behavior can be seen in Ads Skipper (https://apkpure[.]ai/ads-skipper), in ApkPure.

Versions of Ads Skipper with (v. 2.0) and without (v. 1.0) a malicious payload in ApkPure

Third-party marketplaces like those mentioned in the table above often serve as a mirror for Google Play: they simply copy applications and metadata from Google Play to their own servers. Therefore, it is safe to assume that the samples listed in the table were copied from Google Play as well.


While analyzing the С2 server infrastructure, we quickly identified multiple domains that shared similarities with previous ones but were not linked to any known malware samples. This allowed us to uncover more pieces of the attackers’ infrastructure.

Example of related infrastructure

Tracking PhantomLance’s old infrastructure, which dated back four years, we noticed that the expired domain names had been extended. The maintenance suggested that the infrastructure might be used again in the future.

Domain Registered Last updated
osloger[.]biz 2015-12-09 2019-12-01
log4jv[.]info 2015-12-09 2019-11-26
sqllitlever[.]info 2015-12-09 2019-11-26
anofrio[.]com 2017-05-16 2020-03-30
anaehler[.]com 2017-05-16 2020-03-30
viodger[.]com 2017-05-16 2020-04-07

The PhantomLance TTPs indicate that samples are configured only with subdomains as C2 servers, while most, but not all, parent domains do not have their own IP resolution. We checked the ones that did have a valid resolution and found that they all resolved to the same IP address: 188.166.203[.]57. It belongs to the DigitalOcean cloud infrastructure provider and, according to Domaintools, hosts a total of 129 websites.

Looking up records for this IP address in our passive DNS database suggests that a few dozen of these websites are legitimate, as well as the aforementioned PhantomLance domains and two more interesting overlaps with OceanLotus infrastructure:

  • browsersyn[.]com: known domain used as a C2 in a previously publicly reported sample (MD5: b1990e19efaf88206f7bffe9df0d9419) considered by the industry to be the OceanLotus APT.
  • cerisecaird[.]com: privately received information indicates that this domain is related to OceanLotus as well.


We have observed around 300 infection attacks on Android devices in India, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Indonesia, etc. starting in 2016. Below is a rough cartographic representation of countries with top attempted attacks.

We have also seen a number of detections in Nepal, Myanmar and Malaysia. As you can see, this part of South Asia seems to be targeted by the actors the most.

Note that due to the chosen distribution vector (publication of malicious samples on publicly available application stores), there should be secondary infection of random victims not directly related to the actors’ interests.

To get more details on targeted victims, we looked at the types of applications that the malware mimicked. Apart from common luring applications, such as Flash plugins, cleaners and updaters, there were those that specifically targeted Vietnam.

  • luxury.BeerAddress – “Tim quan nhau | Tìm quán nhậu” (“Find each other | Find pubs” in Vietnamese). An application for finding the nearest pub in Vietnam.
  • codedexon.churchaddress – “Địa Điểm Nhà Thờ” (“Church Place”)

    Publisher description (hxxps:// translated from Vietnamese:
    Information about churches near you or the whole of Vietnam, information about patronies, priests, phone numbers, websites, email, activities, holidays…

  • – “Tin 247 – Đọc Báo Hàng Ngày” (“Read Daily Newspaper”)

Mimics the Vietnamese mobile news application.

Overlaps with previous campaigns

In this section, we provide a correlation of PhantomLance’s activity with previously reported campaigns related to the OceanLotus APT.

OceanLotus Android campaign in 2014-2017

In May 2019, Antiy Labs published a report in which they described an Android malware campaign, claiming that it was related to OceanLotus APT. We checked the provided indicators using information from our telemetry and found that the very first tracks of these samples date back to December 2014.

It is important to note that according to our detection statistics, the majority of users affected by this campaign were located in Vietnam, with the exception of a small number of individuals located in China.

The main infection vector seems to be links to malicious applications hosted on third-party websites, possibly distributed via SMS or email spearphishing attacks. Examples below.

Referring URL for victim Malware URL First request Last request
hxxp://[.]vn/android/download/nhaccuatui-downloader/31798 hxxp://[.]apk 2015-03-03 2015-03-22
hxxp://[.]apk 2014-12-29 2015-03-19
hxxp://[.]apk hxxp://[.]apk 2015-04-07 2017-01-04


The latest registered malware download event occurred in December 2017. We observed a small amount of activity in 2018, but judging by the volume of hosted malware and the number of detections we observed, the main campaign took place from late 2014 to 2017.

To best visualize the similarities we discovered, we made a code structure comparison of the sample from the old reported OceanLotus Android campaign (MD5: 0e7c2adda3bc65242a365ef72b91f3a8) and the only unobfuscated (probably a developer version) PhantomLance payload v3 (MD5: 243e2c6433815f2ecc204ada4821e7d6).

Code structure comparison of a sample linked to OceanLotus and PhantomLance payload v3.

 Despite the multiple differences, we observed a similar pattern used in malware implementation. It seems that the developers have renamed “module” to “plugin”, but the meaning remains the same. Overlapping classes look quite similar and have the same functionality. For example, here is a comparison of the methods contained in the Parser classes.

Parser from 0e7c2adda3bc65242a365ef72b91f3a8 ParserWriter/Reader from 243e2c6433815f2ecc204ada4821e7d6
public void appendBoolean(boolean f) public void appendBoolean(boolean value)
public void appendByte(byte data) public void appendByte(byte value)
public void appendBytes(byte[] data) public void appendBytes(byte[] value)
public void appendDouble(double val) public void appendDouble(double value)
public void appendInt(int val) public void appendInt(int value)
public void appendLong(long val) public void appendLong(long value)
private void appendNumber(Object value)
public void appendShort(short val) public void appendShort(short value)
public void appendString(String str) public void appendString(String value)
 public byte[] getContents() public byte[] getContents()
public void appendFloat(float val)
public boolean getBoolean() public boolean getBoolean()
public byte getByte() public byte getByte()
public byte[] getBytes() public byte[] getBytes()
public double getDouble() public double getDouble()
public float getFloat()
public int getInt() public int getInt()
public long getLong() public long getLong()
public short getShort() public short getShort()
byte getSignal()
public String getString() public String getString()

Using our malware attribution technology, we can see that the PhantomLance payloads are at least 20% similar to the ones from the old OceanLotus Android campaign.

OceanLotus macOS backdoors

There are multiple public reports of macOS backdoors linked by the industry to OceanLotus. We examined these in order to find possible overlaps, with the caveat that it was really difficult to compare malware implemented for two completely different platforms, since two different programming languages were obviously used for the implementation process. However, during the analysis of the macOS payload (MD5: 306d3ed0a7c899b5ef9d0e3c91f05193) dated early 2018, we were able to catch a few minor tracks of the code pattern used in the Android malware implementation described above. In particular, three out of seven main classes had the same names and similar functionality: “Converter”, “Packet” and “Parser”.

Summary of overlaps

Another notable attribution token that applies to most of OceanLotus malware across platforms is usage of three redundant, different C2 servers by each sample, mostly subdomains. Below is an example of this from the samples examined above and OceanLotus Windows malware described in our private report.

MD5 C2 servers Description
0d5c03da348dce513bf575545493f3e3 mine.remaariegarcia[.]com



PhantomLance Android
d1eb52ef6c2445c848157beaba54044f sadma.knrowz[.]com



OceanLotus Android campaign 2014-2017
306d3ed0a7c899b5ef9d0e3c91f05193 ssl.arkouthrie[.]com



OceanLotus MacOS backdoor
51f9a7d4263b3a565dec7083ca00340f ps.andreagahuvrauvin[.]com



OceanLotus Windows backdoor

Based on the complete analysis of previous campaigns, with the actors’ interests in victims located in Vietnam, infrastructure overlaps between PhantomLance and OceanLotus for Windows, multiple code similarities between an old Android campaign and MacOS backdoors, we attribute the set of the Android activity (campaign 2014-2017 and PhantomLance) to OceanLotus with medium confidence.

Considering the timeline of the Android campaigns, we believe that the activity reported by Antiy Labs is a previous campaign that was conducted by OceanLotus until 2017, and PhantomLance is a successor, active since 2016.

In summarizing the results of this research, we are able to assess the scope and evolution of the actors’ Android set of activity, operating for almost six years.


Kaspersky Lab products verdicts



Android campaign linked to OceanLotus (2014-2017)

macOS campaign linked to OceanLotus



PhantomLance malware


PhantomLance payload-free versions


Android campaign 2014-2017


Domains and IP addresses



Android campaign 2014-2017


Temp Mails ( is a new free temporary email addresses service. This service provide you random 10 minutes emails addresses. It is also known by names like: temporary mail, disposable mail, throwaway email, one time mail, anonymous email address… All emails received by Tempmail servers are displayed automatically in your online browser inbox.

A look at the ATM/PoS malware landscape from 2017-2019 – 10 minute mail

From remote administration and jackpotting, to malware sold on the Darknet, attacks against ATMs have a long and storied history.  And, much like other areas of cybercrime, attackers only refine and grow their skillset for infecting ATM systems from year-to-year. So what does the ATM landscape look like as of 2020? Let’s take a look.

The world of ATM/PoS malware

ATM attacks aren’t new, and that’s not surprising. After all, what is one of the primary motives driving cyber criminals? Money. And ATMs are cash hubs—one successful attack can net you hundreds of thousands of dollars. In the past, even high-profile threat actors have made ATMs their prime target.

However, attacking ATMs is a bit different from traditional financial-related threats, like phishing emails or spoofed websites. That’s because ATMs operate in a unique space in the tech world: they’re still connected to the corporate networks but at the same time must be accessible to anyone that passes by. The resulting technical differences means the attack methods differ from those used for traditional endpoints.

ATMs also share several common characteristics that make them particularly vulnerable to attacks:

  • Traditional software that is part of the warranty offered by the vendors → If major changes occur that are not approved by the ATM vendor, including installing AV software, then sometimes this warranty is lost.
  • Regular use of outdated operating systems and the apps its runs on
  • Locations chosen in a way that provide access to as many customers as possible, including those in remote regions → These isolated locations often lack any reasonable physical security

Old software means unpatched vulnerabilities—ones criminals can exploit—and isolated areas makes it easier for criminals to gain physical access to the internal ports of the motherboard. This is especially typical for the old ATM machines located in many regions with low resources and no budgets for ATM upgrades.  When combined, ATMs become not only a highly profitable target—but an easy one.

From 2017 to 2019, there has been a marked increase in ATM attacks, due to a few families being particularly active. These target systems around the globe, regardless of the vendor, and have one of two goals: either stealing customers’ information or funneling funds directly from the bank.

Considering all of the above, we decided to delve further into what has been happening in the world of ATM/PoS malware for the last few years.

ATM/oOS malware attacks: by the numbers

To gain a closer look at ATM malware worldwide, we utilized the statistics processed by Kaspersky Security Network (KSN) over the course of the past three years globally.

Number of unique devices that encountered ATM/PoS malware, 2017-2019 (download)

The results showed that the number of unique devices protected by Kaspersky that encountered ATM/PoS (point-of-sale) malware at least once experienced a two-digit growth in 2018—and this number held steady, even increasing slightly, in 2019.

Geography of unique devices that encountered ATM/PoS malware, 2017 (download)

TOP 10 countries by number of unique devices that encountered ATM/PoS malware in 2017

Country Devices
1 Russian Federation 1016
2 Brazil 423
3 Vietnam 281
4 United States 148
5 India 137
6 Turkey 96
7 China 94
8 Germany 58
9 Philippines 53
10 Mexico 51

The ten countries that had the greatest number of unique devices affected by ATM/POS malware were relatively dispersed around the globe, with the highest number in Russia. Russia has had a long history of threat actors targeting financial institutions. For example, it was in 2017 that Kaspersky researchers  uncovered an ATM malware dubbed “ATMitch” that was gaining remote access control over ATMS at Russian banks. In addition, the relatively high rates in both Brazil and Mexico can be partially attributed to Latin and South America’s longstanding history as a hotspot of ATM malware.

Geography of unique devices that encountered ATM/PoS malware, 2018 (download)

TOP 10 countries by number of unique devices that encountered ATM/PoS malware in 2018

Country Devices
1 Russian Federation 1370
2 Brazil 753
3 Italy 537
4 United States 519
5 Vietnam 433
6 India 408
7 Thailand 369
8 Germany 277
9 Turkey 224
10 Iran 198

In 2018, the countries with the greatest number of ATM/PoS malware incidents recorded by unique devices remained distributed worldwide, but the countries remained similar to 2017, with the highest activity recorded in Russia and Brazil.

The overall increase in the number of devices affected can be attributed to both the reappearance of new ATM malware and the development of new families:

  • ATMJackpot first appeared in Taiwan back in 2016. It infects the banks’ internal networks, allowing it to withdraw funds directly from the ATM. ATMJackpot was able to reach thousands of ATMs.
  • WinPot was discovered at the beginning of 2018 in Eastern Europe and was designed to make the infected ATM automatically dispense all cash from its most valuable cassettes. Because of its time counter, its execution is time-dependent: if the targeted system’s time does not fall within the preset period during which the malware was programmed to work (e.g. March), WinPot silently stops operating without showing its interface.
  • Ice5 originated in Latin America. Its engineering tool is written in a scripting language that allows the attackers to achieve a significant level of manipulation over the infected ATMs. The initial infection occurs via the USB port.
  • ATMTest is a multi-stage infection in 2018. It requires console access to the ATM, meaning the attackers have to gain remote access to the bank’s networks. This malware was originally coded to steal money in rubles.
  • Peralta was an evolution of the infamous ATM malware project called Ploutus, which led to losses of $64,864,864.00 across 73,258 compromised ATMs. Both Peralta and Ploutus originated in Latin America.
  • ATMWizX was discovered in the fall of 2018 and dispenses all cash automatically, starting with the most valuable cassettes.
  • ATMDtruck also appeared in the fall of 2018 with indications that the first victims were in India. It collects enough information from the credit cards inputted into the infected ATM that it can actually clone them. It drops the malware “Dtrack”, which is a sophisticated spy tool.

Geography of unique devices that encountered ATM/PoS malware, 2019 (download)

TOP 10 countries by number of unique devices that encountered ATM/PoS malware in 2019

Country Devices
1 Russian Federation 2306
2 Iran 1178
3 Brazil 819
4 Vietnam 416
5 India 353
6 Germany 228
7 United States 220
8 Italy 197
9 Turkey 149
10 Mexico 114

This past year, the ten countries with the highest level of ATM/PoS malware activity remained the same, with only one change: Mexico once again entered the top ten, while Thailand left.

Overall, the total number of devices affected increased once again. In fact, ATM/PoS malware activity reached new levels by the spring of 2019 with a string of operations: ATMqot, ATMqotX, and ATMJaDi. ATMgot operates directly on the ATM using the dispenser to withdraw the maximum number of banknotes allowed; if it cannot do this, it will default to 20 notes. This malware also possesses anti-forensic techniques that allow it to delete traces of the infection from the ATMs, as well as some video files, which could potentially be used as part of video monitoring.

ATMJadi orginated in Latin America and is capable of cashing out ATMs. Since it’s a Java-based project, it’s platform-dependent—and thus highly targeted. In order to be installed, the attackers must gain access to the bank’s network. This suggests the attackers first compromise the bank’s infrastructure. But what’s perhaps most interesting is the false flag section with strings in the Russian language.

The problem of cyberattacks is compounded by the use of outdated and unpatched systems. That means that, even as new 2019 malware families were developed, the old ATM families from the previous years can still be used to launch successful attacks.

A look towards the future

ATM/PoS malware will only continue to evolve, and so, we will continue to monitor the ecosystem closely. We’ve already seen WinPot, first discovered in 2018, active this year in different parts of the world.

Latin America has long been known as a region of innovative cybercriminals who adopt techniques other region uses. It’s not surprising then that a new trend was recently discovered in development: an ATM MaaS project whereby a group in Latin America is attempting to sell ATM malware developed for each major vendor on the market. Projects like these provide further evidence that the world of ATM malware is still evolving, with cybercriminals continuously developing better attack strategies.

Our research has also shown that, beyond Latin America, countries in Europe and the APAC region are of particular interest to ATM attackers, as is the United States. This signifies that ATM malware is a truly global threat. After all, ATMs are located in nearly every country and few systems offer access to such massive amounts of fund.

How, then, can you protect your money? No matter how digital banking has become, ATMs are still an inevitable part of managing your funds. While you can’t control whether or not an ATM machine is attacked, by conscientiously monitoring your accounts and financial transactions, you can make sure suspicious activity is quickly identified and the proper channels duly notified. This should help mitigate the damage caused by any attack.

For financial institutions, staying secure requires a comprehensive, multi-step approach:

  1. Evaluate which attack vectors are more likely to be used and generate a threat model. This will depend, for example, on what network architecture is in place and where the ATM is installed – a place not controlled by your organization, such as a wall on the street, or an office under video surveillance, etc.
  2. Determine which ATMs are outdated or have an OS version that’s reaching the end of its vendor support. If you cannot replace the legacy devices, pay attention to this fact in your threat model and set the appropriate security solution settings, which do not affect the device’s productivity.
  3. Regularly conduct security assessments or pentests of ATMs to find possible cyberattack vectors. Kaspersky’s threat hunting service can also help you find sophisticated cybercriminals.
  4. Regularly review the physical safety of ATMs to detect abnormal elements implemented by attackers.
  1. If ATM configurations permit it, install a security solution that protects the devices from different attack vectors, such as Kaspersky Embedded Systems Security. If the device has extremely low system specs, the Kaspersky solution would still protect it with a Default Deny whitelisting scenario

PoS terminals are in many aspects similar to ATMs, but still possess a number of differences to be mindful of—and tackled accordingly. Apart from the steps mentioned above (which remain applicable), the following must be taken into account:

  1. Often more powerful when compared to an average ATM, Windows-based PoS terminals offer greater spaces for attackers’ maneuvering and are capable of running a broad range of modern malware and hacking tools. This makes implementation of multi-layered protection a must.
  2. While also residing in public spaces, they generally lack ATMs’ heavy armor. Therefore, they are more susceptible to direct attacks using unauthorized devices. This makes properly configured Device Control even more valuable.
  3. As they are frequently involved not only in financial, but also personal, data processing, this adds to their attractiveness for cyberattacks and also subjects them to more legislation. In combination with direct attack scenarios, implementation of file integrity monitoring and log inspection are mandatory, preferably in a way that allows tracking changes offline.
  4. Embedded systems should be protected not only by host-based security, but also by application of network-level security, such as Secure Web Gateways or Next-gen Firewalls capable of detecting and blocking unsolicited communications and other systems both inside and outside of the company’s infrastructure.

Temp Mails ( is a new free temporary email addresses service. This service provide you random 10 minutes emails addresses. It is also known by names like: temporary mail, disposable mail, throwaway email, one time mail, anonymous email address… All emails received by Tempmail servers are displayed automatically in your online browser inbox.

Spam and phishing in 2019 – 10 minute mail

Figures of the year

  • The share of spam in mail traffic was 56.51%, which is 4.03 p.p. more than in 2018.
  • The biggest source of spam this year was China (21.26%).
  • 44% of spam e-mails were less than 2 KB in size.
  • Malicious spam was detected most commonly with the Exploit.MSOffice.CVE-2017-11882 verdict.
  • The Anti-Phishing system was triggered 467,188,119 times.
  • 17 % of unique users encountered phishing.

Beware of novelties

In 2019, attackers were more active than usual in their exploitation of major sports and movie events to gain access to users’ financial or personal data. Premieres of TV shows and films, and sports broadcasts were used as bait for those looking to save money by watching on “unofficial” resources.

A search for “Watch latest X for free” (where X = Avengers movie, Game of Thrones season, Stanley Cup game, US Open, etc.) returned links to sites offering the opportunity to do precisely that. On clicking through to these resources, the broadcast really did begin, only to stop after a couple of minutes. To continue viewing, the user was prompted to create a free account (only an e-mail address and password were required). However, when the Continue button was clicked, the site asked for additional confirmation.

And not just any old information, but bank card details, including the three-digit security code (CVV) on the reverse side. The site administrators assured that funds would not be debited from the card, but that this data was needed only to confirm the user’s location (and hence right to view the content). However, instead of continuing the broadcast, the scammers simply pocketed the details.

New gadgets were also deployed as a bait. Cybercriminals created fake pages mimicking official Apple services. The number of fake sites rose sharply after the company unveiled its new products. And while Apple was only just preparing to release the next gadget, fraudsters were offering to “sell” it to those with itchy hands. All that victim had to do was follow a link and enter their AppleID credentials — the attackers’ objective.

In 2019, scammers found new ways to exploit popular resources and social networks to spread spam and sell non-existent goods and services. They actively used Youtube and Instagram comments to place ads and links to potentially malicious pages, and created numerous social media accounts that they promoted by commenting on the posts of popular bloggers.

For added credibility, they left many fake comments on posts about hot topics. As the account gained a following, it began to post messages about promotions. For example, a sale of branded goods at knock-down prices. Victims either received a cheap imitation or simply lost their cash.

A similar scheme was used to promote get-rich-quick-online videos, coupled with gushing reviews from “newly flush” clients.

Another scam involved fake celebrity Instagram accounts. The “stars” asked fans to take a survey and get a cash payout or the chance to participate in a prize draw. Naturally, a small upfront fee was payable for this unmissable opportunity… After the cybercriminals received the money, the account simply disappeared.

Besides distributing links through comments on social networks, scammers utilized yet another delivery method in the shape of Google services: invitations to meetings sent via Google Calendar or notifications from Google Photos that someone just shared a picture were accompanied by a comment from the attackers with links to fake promotions, surveys, and prize giveaways.

Other Google services were also used: links to files in Google Drive and Google Storage were sent inside fraudulent e-mails, which spam filters are not always able to spot. Clicking it usually opened a file with adware (for example, fake pharmaceutical products) or another link leading to a phishing site or a form for collecting personal data.

Although Google and others are constantly working to protect users from scammers, the latter are forever finding new loopholes. Therefore, the main protection against such schemes is to pay careful attention to messages from unfamiliar senders.

Malicious transactions

In Q1, users of the Automated Clearing House (ACH), an electronic funds-transfer system that facilitates payments in the US, fell victim to fraudsters: we registered mailings of fake ACH notifications about the status of a payment or debt. By clicking the link or opening the attachment, the user risked infecting the computer with malware.

Anyone order bitcoin?

Cryptocurrency continues to be of interest to scammers. Alongside the standard fakes of well-known cryptocurrency exchanges, cybercriminals have started creating their own: such resources promise lucrative exchange rates, but steal either personal data or money.

Cryptocurrencies and blackmail

If in 2018 cybercriminals tried to blackmail users by claiming to have malware-obtained compromising material on them, in 2019 e-mails began arriving from a CIA agent (the name varied) supposedly dealing with a case opened against the message recipient pertaining to the storage and distribution of pornographic images of minors.

The case, the e-mail alleged, was part of an international operation to arrest more than 2,000 pedophilia suspects in 27 countries worldwide. However, the “agent” happened to know that the recipient was a well-heeled individual with a reputation to protect, and for $10,000 in bitcoin would be willing to alter or destroy the dossier (all information about the victim to add credence to the e-mail was harvested in advance from social networks and forums). For someone genuinely afraid of the potential consequences, this would be a small price to pay.

Legal entities found themselves in an even more desperate situation when faced with similar threats. However for them it was not about sextortion, but spamming. The blackmailers sent a message to the company using its public e-mail address or online feedback form in which they demanded a ransom in bitcoin. If refused, the attackers threatened to send millions of spam e-mails in the company’s name. This, the cybercriminals assured, would prompt the Spamhaus Project to recognize the resource as a spammer and block it forever.

Corporate sector in the crosshairs

The growing trend for attacks on the corporate sector is reflected not only in the attempts to cyber-blackmail companies. The reputation of many firms has been compromised by spam mailings through feedback forms. Having previously used such forms to attack the mailboxes of company employees, in 2019 cybercriminals evolved their methods.

As such, messages about successful registation on a particular website were received by people who had never even heard about it. After finding a security hole in the site, spammers used a script to bypass the CAPTCHA system and mass-register users via the feedback form. In the Username field, the attackers inserted message text or link. As a result, the victim whose mailing address was used received a registration confirmation e-mail from a legitimate sender, but containing a message from the scammers. Moreover, the company itself had no idea that this was going on.

A far more serious threat came from mailings masked as automatic notifications from services used to compile legitimate mailing lists: the scammers’ messages were carefully disguised as notifications about new voice messages (some business products have a feature for exchanging voice messages) or about incoming e-mails stuck in the delivery queue. To access them, the employee had to go through an authentication process, whereupon the corporate account credentials ended up in the hands of the attackers.

Scammers devised new methods to coax confidential data out of unsuspecting company employees. For example, by sending e-mails requesting urgent confirmation of corporate account details or payment information with a link conveniently supplied. If the user swallowed the bait, the authentication data for their account went straight to the cybercriminals.

Another attack aimed at the corporate sector employed a more complex scheme: the attackers tried to dupe e-mail recipients into thinking that the company management was offering a pay rise in exchange for taking a performance review.

The message appeared to come from HR and contained detailed instructions and a link to a bogus appraisal form. But before going through the procedure, the recipient had to enter a few details (in most cases it was specified that the e-mail address had to be a corporate one). After clicking the Sign in or Appraisal button, the entered credentials were duly forwarded to the attackers, granting them access to business correspondence, personal data, and probably confidential information too, which could later be used for blackmail or sold to competitors.

A simpler scheme involved sending phishing e-mails supposedly from services used by the company. The most common were fake notifications from HR recruiting platforms.

Statistics: spam

Proportion of spam in mail traffic

The share of spam in mail traffic in 2019 increased by 4.03 p.p. to 56.51%.

Proportion of spam in global mail traffic, 2019 (download)

The lowest figure was recorded in September (54.68%), and the highest in May (58.71%).

Sources of spam by country

In 2019, as in the year before, China retained its crown as the top spam-originating country. Its share grew significantly from the previous year (up 9.57 p.p.) to 21.26%. It remains ahead of the US (14.39%), whose share increased by 5.35 p.p. In third place was Russia (5.21%).

Fourth position went to Brazil (5.02%), despite shedding 1.07 p.p. Fifth place in 2019 was claimed by France (3.00%), and sixth by India (2.84%), which ranked the same as the year before.  Vietnam (2.62%), fourth in the previous reporting period, moved down to seventh.

The TOP 10 is rounded out by Germany, dropping from third to eighth (2.61%, down by 4.56 p.p.), Turkey (2.15%), and Singapore (1.72%).

Sources of spam by country, 2019 (download)

Spam e-mail size

In 2019, the share of very small e-mails continued to grow, but less dramatically than the year before — by just 4.29 p.p. to 78.44%. Meanwhile, the share of e-mails sized 2–5 KB decreased against 2018 by 4.22 p.p. to 6.42%.

Spam e-mails by size, 2019 (download)

The share of larger e-mails (10–20 KB) changed insignificantly, down by 0.84 p.p. But there was more junk mail sized 20–50 KB: such messages accounted for 4.50% (+1.68 p.p) In addition, the number of 50–100 KB sized e-mails rose by almost 1 p.p, amounting to 1.81%.

Malicious mail attachments

Malware families

TOP 10 malware families, 2019 (download)

In 2019, like the year before it, Exploit.Win32.CVE-2017-11882 malicious objects were the most commonly encountered malware (7.24%). They exploited a vulnerability in Microsoft Office that allowed arbitrary code to be executed without the user’s knowledge.

In second place is the Trojan.MSOffice.SAgent family (3.59%), whose members also attack Microsoft Office users. This type of malware consists of a document with a built-in VBA script that secretly loads other malware using PowerShell when the document is opened.

The Worm.Win32.WBVB family (3.11%), which includes executable files written in Visual Basic 6 and classed as untrusted by KSN, rose from fourth place in the rating to third.

Backdoor.Win32.Androm.gen (1.64%), which ranked second in the previous reporting period, dropped to fourth position. This modular backdoor is most often used to download malware onto the victim’s machine.

Fifth place in 2019 was taken by the Trojan.Win32.Kryptik family (1.53%). This verdict is assigned to Trojans that use anti-emulation, anti-debugging, and code obfuscation to make them difficult to analyze.

Trojan.MSIL.Crypt.gen (1.26%) took sixth place, while Trojan.PDF.Badur (1.14%) — a PDF that directs the user to a potentially dangerous site — climbed to seventh.

Eighth position fell to another malicious DOC/DOCX document with a malicious VBA script inside — Trojan-Downloader.MSOffice.SLoad.gen (1.14%), which, when opened, may download ransomware onto the victim’s computer.

In ninth place is Backdoor.Win32.Androm, and propping up the table is Trojan.Win32.Agent (0.92%).


Countries targeted by malicious mailings

As in the previous year, Germany took first place in 2019. Its share remained virtually unchanged: 11.86% of all attacks (+0.35 p.p.). Second place was claimed jointly by Russia and Vietnam (5.77% each) — Russia held this position in the previous reporting period, while Vietnam’s rise to the TOP 3 came from sixth position.

Countries targeted by malicious mailings, 2019 (download)

Lagging behind by just 0.2 p.p. is Italy (5.57%), while the UAE is in fifth place (4.74%), Brazil in sixth (3.88%), and Spain in seventh (3.45%). The TOP 10 is rounded out by the practically neck-and-neck India (2.67%), Mexico (2.63%), and Malaysia (2.39%).

Statistics: phishing

In 2019, the Anti-Phishing system was triggered 467 188 119 times on Kaspersky user computers as a result of phishing redirection attempts (15,277,092 fewer than in 2018). In total, 15.17% of our users were attacked.

Organizations under attack

The rating of organizations targeted by phishing attacks is based on the triggering of the heuristic component in the Anti-Phishing system on user computers. This component detects all instances when the user tries to follow a link in an e-mail or on the Internet to a phishing page in cases when such link has yet to be added to Kaspersky’s databases.

Rating of categories of organizations attacked by phishers

In contrast to 2018, in this reporting period the largest share of heuristic component triggers fell to the Banks category. Its slice increased by 5.46 p.p. to 27.16%. Last year’s leader, the Global Internet Portals category, moved down a rung to second. Against last year, its share decreased by 3.60 p.p. (21.12%). The Payment Systems category remained in third place, its share in 2019 amounting to 16.67% (-2.65 p.p.).

Distribution of organizations subject to phishing attacks by category, 2019 (download)

Attack geography

Countries by share of attacked users

This period’s leader by percentage of attacked unique users out of the total number of users was Venezuela (31.16%).

Percentage of users on whose computers the Anti-Phishing system was triggered out of all Kaspersky users in the country, 2019 (download)


TOP 10 countries by share of attacked users

Country %
Venezuela 31.16
Brazil 30.26
Greece 25.96
Portugal 25.63
Australia 25.24
Algeria 23.93
Chile 23.84
Réunion 23.82
Ecuador 23.53
French Guiana 22.94

TOP 10 countries by share of attacked users

Last year’s leader, Brazil (30.26%), this year found itself in second place, shedding 1.98 p.p. and ceding top spot to Venezuela (31.16%), which moved up from ninth position, gaining 11.27 p.p. In third place was TOP 10 newcomer Greece (25.96%).


TV premieres, high-profile sporting events, and the release of new gadgets were exploited by scammers to steal users’ personal data or money.

In the search for new ways to bypass spam filters, attackers are developing new methods of delivering their messages. This year, they made active use of various Google services, as well as popular social networks (Instagram) and video hosting sites (YouTube).

Cybercriminals continue to use the topic of finance in schemes aimed at gaining access to users’ personal data, infecting computers with malware, or stealing funds from victims’ accounts.

The main trend of 2019 was the rise in the number of attacks on the corporate sector. Fraudulent schemes previously used to repeatedly attack ordinary users changed direction, adding new intricacies to cybercriminal tactics.

Temp Mails ( is a new free temporary email addresses service. This service provide you random 10 minutes emails addresses. It is also known by names like: temporary mail, disposable mail, throwaway email, one time mail, anonymous email address… All emails received by Tempmail servers are displayed automatically in your online browser inbox.

Unkillable xHelper and a Trojan matryoshka – 10 minute mail

It was the middle of last year that we detected the start of mass attacks by the xHelper Trojan on Android smartphones, but even now the malware remains as active as ever. The main feature of xHelper is entrenchment — once it gets into the phone, it somehow remains there even after the user deletes it and restores the factory settings. We conducted a thorough study to determine how xHelper’s creators furnished it with such survivability.

Share of Kaspersky users attacked by the xHelper Trojan in the total number of attacks, 2019-2020

How does xHelper work?

Let’s analyze the family’s logic based on the currently active sample Trojan-Dropper.AndroidOS.Helper.h. The malware disguises itself as a popular cleaner and speed-up app for smartphones, but in reality there is nothing useful about it: after installation, the “cleaner” simply disappears and is nowhere to be seen either on the main screen or in the program menu. You can see it only by inspecting the list of installed apps in the system settings.

The Trojan’s payload is encrypted in the file /assets/firehelper.jar (since its encryption is practically unchanged from earlier versions, it was not difficult to decrypt). Its main task is to send information about the victim’s phone (android_id, manufacturer, model, firmware version, etc.) to https://lp.cooktracking[.]com/v1/ls/get…

Decrypting the URL for sending device information

…and downloading the next malicious module — Trojan-Dropper.AndroidOS.Agent.of.

This malware in turn decrypts and launches its payload using a bundled native library; this approach makes it difficult to analyze the module. At this stage, the next dropper, Trojan-Dropper.AndroidOS.Helper.b, is decrypted and launched. This in turn runs the malware Trojan-Downloader.AndroidOS.Leech.p, which further infects the device.

Leech.p is tasked with downloading our old friend HEUR:Trojan.AndroidOS.Triada.dd with a set of exploits for obtaining root privileges on the victim’s device.

Decoding the URL of the Leech.p C&C

Downloading the Triada Trojan

Malicious files are stored sequentially in the app’s data folder, which other programs do not have access to. This matryoshka-style scheme allows the malware authors to obscure the trail and use malicious modules that are known to security solutions. The malware can gain root access mainly on devices running Android versions 6 and 7 from Chinese manufacturers (including ODMs). After obtaining privileges, xHelper can install malicious files directly in the system partition.

Note here that the system partition is mounted at system startup in read-only mode. Armed with root rights, the Trojan remounts it in write mode and proceeds to the main job of starting the tellingly named script Triada employs its best-known tricks, including remounting the system partition to install its programs there. In our case, the package com.diag.patches.vm8u is installed, which we detect as Trojan-Dropper.AndroidOS.Tiny.d.

And several executable files get copied to the /system/bin folder:

  • patches_mu8v_oemlogo — Trojan.AndroidOS.Triada.dd
  • debuggerd_hulu —AndroidOS.Triada.dy
  • kcol_ysy — HEUR:Trojan.AndroidOS.Triada.dx
  • /.luser/bkdiag_vm8u_date — HEUR:Trojan.AndroidOS.Agent.rt

A few more files are copied to the /system/xbin folder:

  • diag_vm8u_date
  • patches_mu8v_oemlogo

A call to files from the xbin folder is added to the file, which allows Triada to run at system startup. All files in the target folders are assigned the immutable attribute, which makes it difficult to delete the malware, because the system does not allow even superusers to delete files with this attribute. However, this self-defense mechanism employed by the Trojan can be countered by deleting this attribute using the chattr command.

The question arises: if the malware is able to remount the system partition in write mode in order to copy itself there, can the user adopt the same strategy to delete it? Triada’s creators also contemplated this question, and duly applied another protection technique that involved modifying the system library /system/lib/ This library contains common code used by almost all executable files on the device. Triada substitutes its own code for the mount function (used to mount file systems) in libc, thereby preventing the user from mounting the /system partition in write mode.

On top of that, the Trojan downloads and installs several more malicious programs (for example, HEUR:Trojan-Dropper.AndroidOS.Necro.z), and deletes root access control applications, such as Superuser.

How to get rid of xHelper?

As follows from the above, simply removing xHelper does not entirely disinfect the system. The program com.diag.patches.vm8u, installed in the system partition, reinstalls xHelper and other malware at the first opportunity.

Installing programs without user participation

But if you have Recovery mode set up on your Android smartphone, you can try to extract the file from the original firmware and replace the infected one with it, before removing all malware from the system partition. However, it’s simpler and more reliable to completely reflash the phone.

Bear in mind too that the firmware of smartphones attacked by xHelper sometimes contains preinstalled malware that independently downloads and installs programs (including xHelper). In this case, reflashing is pointless, so it would be worth considering alternative firmwares for your device. If you do use a different firmware, remember that some of the device’s components might not operate properly.

In any event, using a smartphone infected with xHelper is extremely dangerous. The malware installs a backdoor with the ability to execute commands as a superuser. It provides the attackers with full access to all app data and can be used by other malware too, for example, CookieThief.



Trojan-Dropper.AndroidOS.Helper.h — 59acb21b05a16c08ade1ec50571ba5d4
Trojan-Dropper.AndroidOS.Agent.of — 57cb18969dfccfd3e22e33ed5c8c66ce
Trojan-Dropper.AndroidOS.Helper.b — b5ccbfd13078a341ee3d5f6e35a54b0a
Trojan-Downloader.AndroidOS.Leech.p — 5fdfb02b94055d035e38a994e1f420ae
Trojan.AndroidOS.Triada.dd — 617f5508dd3066de7ec647bdd1497118
Trojan-Dropper.AndroidOS.Tiny.d — 21ae93aa54156d0c6913243cb45700ec
Trojan.AndroidOS.Triada.dd —  105265b01bac8e224e34a700662ffc4c8
Trojan.AndroidOS.Agent.rt — 95e2817a37c317b17de42e565475f40f
Trojan.AndroidOS.Triada.dy — cfe7d8c9c1e43ca02a4b1852cb34d5a5
Trojan.AndroidOS.Triada.dx — e778d4cc1a7901689b59e9abebc925e1
Trojan-Dropper.AndroidOS.Necro.z — 2887ab410356ea06d99286327e2bc36b

Temp Mails ( is a new free temporary email addresses service. This service provide you random 10 minutes emails addresses. It is also known by names like: temporary mail, disposable mail, throwaway email, one time mail, anonymous email address… All emails received by Tempmail servers are displayed automatically in your online browser inbox.

Loncom packer: from backdoors to Cobalt Strike – 10 minute mail

The previous story described an unusual way of distributing malware under disguise of an update for an expired security certificate. After the story went out, we conducted a detailed analysis of the samples we had obtained, with some interesting findings. All of the malware we examined from the campaign was packed with the same packer, which we named Trojan-Dropper.NSIS.Loncom. The malware uses legitimate NSIS software for packing and loading shellcode, and Microsoft Crypto API for decrypting the final payload. Just as the earlier find, this one was not without its surprises, as one of the packaged samples contained software used by APT groups.

Primary analysis

Loncom utilizes NSIS for running shellcode contained in a file with a name that consists of numbers. In our example, the file is named 485101134:

Overview of the NSIS archive contents

Once the shellcode is unpacked to the hard disk and loaded into the memory, an NSIS script calculates the starting position and proceeds to the next stage.

What the shellcode does

Before proceeding to decrypt the payload, the shellcode starts decrypting itself piece by piece, using the following algorithm:

  • Find position for next 0xDEADBEEF dword.
  • Read dword: size of data to decrypt.
  • Read dword: first part of key.
  • Read dword: second part of key.
  • Find suitable key: check the numbers consequently, starting at 0, while xor(i, second part of key) != first part of key. This part is needed to hold up execution and prevent AV detection. After simplification, key = i = xor(first part, second part).
  • Decrypt next part of shellcode (xor), move on to it.

Decrypting the next part of the shellcode

Here’s the code that performs the algorithm described above:

After several such iterations of block decryption, the shellcode switches to active steps, loading libraries and retrieving the addresses of required functions with the help of the APIHashing technique. This helps avoid stating the names of requested functions directly, providing their hashes instead. When searching for functions by hash, a hash will be calculated for each element from the library export table until it matches the target.

Then, Loncom decrypts the payload contained in the same file as the shellcode and proceeds to run it. The payload is encrypted with an AES-256 block cipher. The decryption key is stated in the code, and the payload offset and size are passed from the NSIS script.

The main part of the shellcode: decrypting the payload


For automated Loncom unpacking, we need to find out how data is stored in the packed NSIS installers, obtain the payload offset and size from the NSIS script, and pull the key from the shellcode.

Unpacking the NSIS

After a brief analysis, we managed to find that the NSIS installers have the following structure:

  • an MZPE NSIS interpreter containing in its overlay the data to be processed: the flag, the signatures, the size of the unpacked header, and the total size of the data, and then the containers, i.e. the compressed data itself.
  • Containers in the following format: dword (data size):zlib_deflate(data). The 0th container has the header, the first container has our file with the shellcode and the payload, and the second one has the DLL with the NSIS plugin.
  • The header contains a table of operation codes for the NSIS interpreter, a string table and a language table.

As we have obtained the encrypted file, now all we need is to find the payload offset and size, and proceed to decrypting the payload and the shellcode.

NSIS data structure

As all arguments in the NSIS operation codes when using plugins are passed as strings, we need to retrieve from the header string table all strings that look like numbers within the logical limits: from 0 to (file size – shellcode size).
NSIS unpacking code:

To simplify determining the payload offset and size, we can recall the structure of the file with the shellcode: encrypted blocks are decrypted from the smallest address to the largest, top to bottom, and the payload is located above the shellcode. Thus, we can determine the position of the 0xDEADBEEF byte and consider it the end of the encrypted data (aligning as required, because AES is a block cipher).

Decrypting the shellcode

To decrypt the payload, we need to:

  • decrypt the shellcode blocks;
  • determine where the AES key is;
  • retrieve the key;
  • try to decrypt the payload for offsets received from the NSIS;
  • stop after obtaining the first two bytes = ‘MZ’.

Step one can be performed by slightly modifying the code that performs the decryption algorithm in IDA Pro. The key can be determined with the help of a simple regular expression: ‘xC7x45.(….)xC7x45.(….)xC7x45.(….)xC7x45.(….)xE8’ — “mov dword ptr” 4 times, then “call” (pseudocode in the main part of the shellcode).
The other steps do not require a detailed explanation. We will now describe the actual malware that was packed with Loncom.

What’s inside

Besides Mokes and Buerak, which we mentioned in the previous article, we noticed packed specimens of Backdoor.Win32.DarkVNC and Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Sodin families, also known as REvil and Sodinokibi. The first is a type of backdoor used for controlling an infected machine via the VNC protocol. The second is a ransomware that encrypts the victim’s information and threatens to publish it.
However, the most exciting find was the Cobalt Strike utility, used both by legal pentesters and by various APT groups. The command center of the sample that contained Cobalt Strike had previously been seen distributing CactusTorch, a utility for running shellcode present in Cobalt Strike modules, and the same Cobalt Strike packed with a different packer.

We continue monitoring Trojan-Dropper.NSIS.Loncom and hope to share new findings soon.


BB00BA9726F922E07CF243D3CCFC2B6E (Backdoor.Win32.DarkVNC)
EBE191BF77044961684DF51B88CA8D05 (Backdoor.Win32.DarkVNC)
4B4C98AC8F04680F7C529956CFE8519B (Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Sodin)
AEF8FBB5C64734093E78EB13E6FA7849 (Cobalt Strike)

Temp Mails ( is a new free temporary email addresses service. This service provide you random 10 minutes emails addresses. It is also known by names like: temporary mail, disposable mail, throwaway email, one time mail, anonymous email address… All emails received by Tempmail servers are displayed automatically in your online browser inbox.

Holy water: ongoing targeted water-holing attack in Asia – 10 minute mail

On December 4, 2019, we discovered watering hole websites that were compromised to selectively trigger a drive-by download attack with fake Adobe Flash update warnings. This campaign has been active since at least May 2019, and targets an Asian religious and ethnic group.

The threat actor’s unsophisticated but creative toolset has been evolving a lot since the inception date, may still be in development, and leverages Sojson obfuscation, NSIS installer, Python, open-source code, GitHub distribution, Go language, as well as Google Drive-based C2 channels.

The threat actor’s operational target is not clear because, unfortunately, we haven’t been able to observe many live operations, and we couldn’t identify any overlap with known intrusion sets.

Thou shalt update plugins: attack synopsis

The watering holes have been set-up on websites that belong to personalities, public bodies, charities and organizations of the targeted group. At the time of writing, some of these websites (all hosted on the same server) are still compromised, and continue to direct selected visitors to malicious payloads:

Domain Description
***** Voluntary service program
***** Religious personality’s charity
***** Policy institute
***** Religious personality
***** Public body
***** Charity
***** Environmental conservation network
***** Fair trade organization

Upon visiting one of the watering hole websites, a previously compromised but legitimately embedded resource will load a malicious JavaScript. It’s hosted by one of the water-holed websites, and gathers information on the visitor. An external server (see Fig. 1) then ascertains whether the visitor is a target.

Fig. 1. Target validation service request.

If the visitor is validated as a target, the first JavaScript stage will load a second one, which in turn will trigger the drive-by download attack, showing a fake update pop-up (see Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Warning generated by the second payload.

The visitor is then expected to fall into the update trap, and download a malicious installer package that will set up a backdoor.

For nothing is hidden that will not come to light: technical analysis

1st JavaScript stage

The first JavaScript stage is named (script|jquery)-css.js, and is obfuscated with the Chinese-language web service Sojson, version 4 (see Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Sojson v4 JavaScript obfuscated one-liner.

The payload leverages the RTCPeerConnection API and ipify service to fingerprint visitors. The gathered data is sent to loginwebmailnic.dynssl[.]com through HTTP GET requests, in order to validate the visitor as a target:


The JSON-formatted response, whose only key is “result”, can either be “t” or “f” (true or false). If the value is “f”, then nothing happens, while “t” will trigger the second JavaScript stage (see Fig. 4).

Fig. 4. First stage deobfuscated validation logic.

In a previous version of this first JavaScript script, an additional JavaScript payload was unconditionally loaded during the first stage, and proceeded with another branch of visitor validation and the second stage.

This other branch loaded scripts from root20system20macosxdriver.serveusers[.]com, and leveraged https://loginwebmailnic.dynssl[.]com/part/mac/contentmc.php URL to validate targets. The host and validation page names suggest this other branch may have been specifically targeting MacOS users, but we were unable to confirm this hypothesis.

2nd JavaScript stage

The second JavaScript stage is named (script|jquery)-file.js, and is obfuscated with Sojson version 5 (see Fig. 5).

Fig. 5. Nerve-breaking one-line obfuscation.

The payload leverages jquery.fileDownload to show a modal pop-up to the target. It offers visitors an update to Flash Player. No technical vulnerabilities are exploited: the threat actor relies on the target’s willingness to keep their system up to date. The deobfuscated JavaScript payload (see Fig. 6) reveals that the malicious update is hosted on GitHub.

Fig. 6. Malicious update source in second JavaScript payload.

GitHub FlashUpdate repository

The pop-up links to a PE executable hosted on github[.]com/AdobeFlash32/FlashUpdate. GitHub disabled this repository on February 14 after we reported it to them. However, the repository has been online for more than nine months, and thanks to GitHub’s commit history (see Fig. 7), we gained a unique insight into the attacker’s activity and tools.

Fig. 7. GitHub’s AdobeFlash32 commit history.

Four executables were hosted in AdobeFlash32/FlashUpdate on the last day it was still available:

  • An installer package, embedding a decoy legitimate Flash update and a stager.
  • Godlike12, a Go backdoor that implements a Google Drive based C2 channel.
  • Two versions of the open-source Stitch Python backdoor that the threat actor modified to add functionalities (persistence, auto-update, decoy download and execution).

Digging into the repository for older commits, we also discovered a previous fake update toolset: a C installer bundling the legitimate Flash installer and a vanilla Stitch backdoor, as well as a C++ infostealer that collects information about host computers (OS version, IP address, hostname) and sends them over HTTP/S.

Installer package

MD5 9A819F2CE060058745FF5374221ADA7C
Compilation date 2017-Jul-24 06:35:22
File type PE32 executable (GUI) Intel 80386, for MS Windows, Nullsoft Installer self-extracting archive
File size 4420 KB
File names flashplayer32ppi_xa_install.exe

This malicious update package is a NSIS installer version 3 that will drop and execute two other binaries:

  • FlashUpdate.exe, D59B35489CB88619415D175953CA5400, a legitimate Windows Flash Player installer from January 15 that is used as a decoy to trick the user into believing they actually set up a Flash update. As modern Adobe Flash installers ‘phone home’ to check for their own validity, this one will fail nowadays with a message stating that the installer is outdated or renamed, and will direct the user to the Adobe website.
  • Intelsyc.exe, the malicious payload (described below).

The installer is detected by Kaspersky endpoint protection heuristics as HEUR:Trojan.Win32.Tasker.gen.

Intelsyc Go stager

MD5 6DC5F8282DF76F4045F75FEA3277DF41
Compilation date 1970-Jan-01 00:00:00
File type PE32 executable (GUI) Intel 80386 (stripped to external PDB), for MS Windows
File size 5976 KB
File names flashplayer32ppi_xa_install.exe
C2 server adobeflash31_install.ddns[.]info
User Agent Go-http-client/1.1

The Go programmed Intelsyc implant is aimed at staging itself, downloading the Godlike12 backdoor (described below), and setting up persistence.

It will first retrieve /flash/sys.txt with HTTP GET on adobeflash31_install.ddns[.]info. The file contents may be used as a killswitch to stop any further deployment. If the content is “1” though, the implant will:

  • copy itself to C:/ProgramData/Intel/Intelsyc.exe;
  • establish persistence through schtasks [T1053] with a logon task named Intelsyc, run as system, and pointing to a previously created self copy;
  • download Godlike12 from github[.]com/AdobeFlash32/FlashUpdate, as C:ProgramDataAdobeflashdriver.exe;
  • establish Godlike12 persistence through a registry run key [T1060] named flashdriver in HKLMSOFTWAREMicrosoftWindowsCurrentVersionRun, and pointing to a previously downloaded backdoor.

The stager is detected by Kaspersky endpoint protection heuristics as UDS:DangerousObject.Multi.Generic, and may be misidentified as the GoRansom Go ransomware proof of concept by other endpoint protection products.

Source files paths in the code suggest this backdoor may have been developed on a Windows system.

Godlike12 Go backdoor

MD5 BEC4482890A89F0184B463C727709D53
Compilation date 1970-Jan-01 00:00:00
File type PE32 executable (GUI) Intel 80386 (stripped to external PDB), for MS Windows
File size 4436 KB
File names flashdriver.exe
C2 server Google Drive

This implant is written in Go language, and its C2 channel relies on file exchanges with a Google Drive space, through Google Drive’s HTTPS API v3. The implant probably leverages the gdrive Go source from GitHub, as it shares several identical code source paths with it.

Godlike12 is the name the threat actor gave to the Google Drive space connections from this implant. Source file paths in the code suggest this backdoor may have been developed on a GNU/Linux system. The not-so-common (less than 100 results in a popular search engine) /root/gowork GOPATH that some of this backdoor’s modules have been compiled from seems popular in Chinese-speaking communities, and may originate from a Chinese-authored tutorial on Go language.

Godlike12 first proceeds with host fingerprinting upon startup (hostname, IP address, MAC address, Windows version, current time). The result is encrypted, base64-encoded, stored in a text file at %TEMP%/[ID]-lk.txt, and uploaded to the remote Google Drive. The implant then regularly checks for a remote [ID]-cs.txt, that contains encrypted commands to execute, and stores encrypted command results in %TEMP%/[ID]-rf.txt to later upload them to the same Google Drive space. ID is the MD5 hash of the base64-encoded MAC address of the first connected network adapter, while TripleDES in ECB mode is used as an encryption algorithm. It is worth mentioning that once again, the encryption function seems to have been inspired from existing open-source code, which mainly appears popular in Chinese-language forums.

Godlike12 does not implement a persistence mechanism, as it is provided by the previous installer package. It is detected by Kaspersky endpoint protection heuristics as HEUR:Trojan.Win32.Generic.

With this implant being a month old at the time of writing (while being in use since at least October 2019), and other malicious update implants having been used before, it is possible that Godlike12-based operations were still a work in progress when we investigated them.

Modified Stitch Python backdoor

MD5 EC993FF561CBC175953502452BFA554A
Compilation date 2008-Nov-10 09:40:35
File type PE32 executable (DLL) (GUI) Intel 80386, for MS Windows
File size 7259 KB
File names flashplayer32_xa_pp_install.exe
C2 server system0_update04driver_roots.dynamic-dns[.]net:443

This implant is a modified version of the open-source Python backdoor called Stitch, packed as a standalone PE executable with Py2exe.

Threat actors wrapped Stitch with custom Python code to perform additional operations:

  • It downloads a legitimate Adobe Flash installation program from the C2 server at startup;
  • It auto-updates the backdoor from ubntrooters.serveuser[.]com at startup;
  • It ensures persistence through schtasks [T1053] with a logon task named AdobeUpdater pointing to C:ProgramDatapackageAdobeService.exe.

Under the hood, Stitch is a remote shell program that provides classic backdoor functionalities by establishing a direct socket connection, to exchange AES-encrypted data with the remote server.


With almost 10 compromised websites and dozens of implanted hosts (that we know of), the attackers have set up a sizable yet very targeted water-holing attack. The toolset that’s being used seems low-budget and not fully developed, but has been modified several times in a few months to leverage interesting features like Google Drive C2, and would be characteristic of a small, agile team.

We were unable to observe any live operations, but some tracks indicate that the Godlike12 backdoor is not widespread, and is probably used to conduct reconnaissance and data-exfiltration operations.

We were unable to correlate these attacks to any known APT groups.
For more details and the latest information on this threat actor, please contact int[email protected]

Appendix – IOCs


Domain IP address Description
root20system20macosxdriver.serveusers[.]com 45.32.154[.]111 Watering hole targets validator server
loginwebmailnic.dynssl[.]com 207.148.117[.]159 Watering hole targets validator server
ubntrooters.serveuser[.]com 45.76.43[.]153 Stitch auto-update server
system0_update04driver_roots.dynamic-dns[.]net 95.179.171[.]173 Stitch C2
sys_andriod20_designer.dynamic-dns[.]net 45.63.114[.]152 Stitch C2
adobeflash31_install.ddns[.]info 95.179.171[.]173 Installer package C2
airjaldinet[.]ml 108.61.178[.]125 Older C++ validator C2



Hashes (MD5)


Temp Mails ( is a new free temporary email addresses service. This service provide you random 10 minutes emails addresses. It is also known by names like: temporary mail, disposable mail, throwaway email, one time mail, anonymous email address… All emails received by Tempmail servers are displayed automatically in your online browser inbox.

iOS exploit chain deploys “LightSpy” feature-rich malware – 10 minute mail

A watering hole was discovered on January 10, 2020 utilizing a full remote iOS exploit chain to deploy a feature-rich implant named LightSpy. The site appears to have been designed to target users in Hong Kong based on the content of the landing page. Since the initial activity, we released two private reports exhaustively detailing spread, exploits, infrastructure and LightSpy implants.

Landing page of watering hole site

We are temporarily calling this APT group “TwoSail Junk”. Currently, we have hints from known backdoor callbacks to infrastructure about clustering this campaign with previous activity. And we are working with colleagues to tie LightSpy with prior activity from a long running Chinese-speaking APT group, previously reported on as Spring Dragon/Lotus Blossom/Billbug(Thrip), known for their Lotus Elise and Evora backdoor malware. Considering this LightSpy activity has been disclosed publicly by our colleagues from TrendMicro, we would like to further contribute missing information to the story without duplicating content. And, in our quest to secure technologies for a better future, we reported the malware and activity to Apple and other relevant companies.

This supplemental information can be difficult to organize to make for easy reading. In light of this, this document is broken down into several sections.

  1. Deployment timeline – additional information clarifying LightSpy deployment milestone events, including both exploit releases and individual LightSpy iOS implant component updates.
  2. Spreading – supplemental technical details on various techniques used to deliver malicious links to targets
  3. Infrastructure – supplemental description of a TwoSail Junk RDP server, the LightSpy admin panel, and some related server-side javascript
  4. Android implant and a pivot into evora – additional information on an Android implant and related infrastructure. After pivoting from the infrastructure in the previous section, we find related implants and backdoor malware, helping to connect this activity to previously known SpringDragon APT with low confidence.

More information about LightSpy is available to customers of Kaspersky Intelligence Reporting. Contact: [email protected]

Deployment timeline

During our investigation, we observed the actor modifying some components involved in the exploit chain on February 7, 2020 with major changes, and on March 5, 2020 with minor ones.

Figure 1. Brief LightSpy event timeline

The first observed version of the WebKit exploit dated January 10, 2020 closely resembled a proof of concept (PoC), containing elements such as buttons, alert messages, and many log statements throughout. The second version commented out or removed many of the log statements, changed alert() to print() statements, and also introduced some language errors such as “your device is not support…” and “stab not find…”.

By analyzing the changes in the first stage WebKit exploit, we discovered the list of supported devices was also significantly extended:
Table 1. iOS version exploit support expansion

Device iOS version Supported as of Jan 10 Supported as of Feb 7
iPhone 6 11.03 +
iPhone 6S 12.01 + commented
12.2 +
iPhone 7 12.1 +
12.11 + +
12.12 + +
12.14 +
12.2 +
iPhone 7+ 12.2 +
iPhone 8 12.2 +
iPhone 8+ 12.2 +
iPhone X 12.2 +

As seen above, the actor was actively changing implant components, which is why we are providing a full list of historical hashes in the IoC section at the end of this report. There were many minor changes that did not directly affect the functionality of each component, but there were also some exceptions to this that will be expanded on below. Based on our observations of these changes over a relatively short time frame, we can assess that the actor implemented a fairly agile development process, with time seemingly more important than stealthiness or quality.

One interesting observation involved the “EnvironmentalRecording” plugin (MD5: ae439a31b8c5487840f9ad530c5db391), which was a dynamically linked shared library responsible for recording surrounding audio and phone calls. On February 7, 2020, we noticed a new binary (MD5: f70d6b3b44d855c2fb7c662c5334d1d5) with the same name with no similarities to the earlier one. This new file did not contain any environment paths, version stamps, or any other traces from the parent plugin pattern. Its sole purpose was to clean up the implant components by erasing all files located in “/var/iolight/”, “/bin/light/”, and “/bin/irc_loader/”. We’re currently unsure whether the actor intended to replace the original plugin with an uninstall package or if this was a result of carelessness or confusion from the rapid development process.

Another example of a possible mistake involved the “Screenaaa” plugin. The first version (MD5: 35fd8a6eac382bfc95071d56d4086945) that was deployed on January 10, 2020 did what we expected: It was a small plugin designed to capture a screenshot, create a directory, and save the capture file in JPEG format. However, the plugin (MD5: 7b69a20920d3b0e6f0bffeefdce7aa6c) with the same name that was packaged on February 7 had a completely different functionality. This binary was actually a LAN scanner based on MMLanScan, an open source project for iOS that helps scan a network to show available devices along with their MAC addresses, hostname, and manufacturer. Most likely, this plugin was mistakenly bundled up in the February 7 payload with the same name as the screenshot plugin.

Figure 2. LightSpy iOS implant component layout and communications


We cannot say definitively that we have visibility into all of their spreading mechanisms. We do know that in past campaigns, precise targeting of individuals was performed over various social network platforms with direct messaging. And, both ours and previous reporting from others have documented TwoSail Junk’s less precise and broad use of forum posts and replies. These forum posts direct individuals frequenting these sites to pages hosting iframes served from their exploit servers. We add Telegram channels and instagram posts to the list of communication channels abused by these attackers.

These sites and communication medium are known to be frequented by some activist groups.

Figure 3. LightSpy iPhone infection steps

The initial watering hole site (hxxps://appledaily.googlephoto[.]vip/news[.]html) on January 10, 2020 was designed to mimic a well known Hong Kong based newspaper “Apple Daily” by copy-pasting HTML content from the original:

Figure 4. Source of html page mimicking newspaper “Apple Daily”

However, at that time, we had not observed any indications of the site being purposely distributed in the wild. Based on our KSN detection statistics, we began seeing a massive distribution campaign beginning on February 18, 2020.

Table 2. LightSpy related iframe domains, urls, and first seen timestamps

Starting on February 18, the actors began utilizing a series of invisible iframes to redirect potential victims to the exploit site as well as the intended legitimate news site from the lure.

Figure 5. Source of html page with lure and exploit


RDP Clues

The domain used for the initial watering hole page (googlephoto[.]vip) was registered through GoDaddy on September 24, 2019. No unmasked registration information was able to be obtained for this domain. The subdomain (appledaily.googlephoto[.]vip) began resolving to a non-parked IP address (103.19.9[.]185) on January 10, 2020 and has not moved since. The server is located in Singapore and is hosted by Beyotta Network, LLP.

At the time of our initial investigation, the server was listening on ports 80 (HTTP) and 3389 (RDP with SSL/TLS enabled). The certificate for the server was self-signed and created on December 16, 2019. Based on Shodan data as early as December 21, 2019, there was a currently logged in user detected who’s name was “SeinandColt”.

Figure 6. Screenshot of RDP login page for the server 103.19.9[.]185

Admin Panel

The C2 server for the iOS payload (45.134.1[.]180) also appeared to have an admin panel on TCP port 50001.

The admin panel seems to be a Vue.js application bundled with Webpack. It contains two language packs: English and Chinese. A cursory analysis provides us the impression of actual scale of the framework:

If we take a closer look at the index.js file for the panel, some interesting configurations are visible, to include a user config, an application list, log list, and other interesting settings.

The “userConfig” variable indicates other possible platforms that may have been targeted by the same actors, such as linux, windows, and routers.

Another interesting setting includes the “app_list” variable which is commented out. This lists two common applications used for streaming and chat mostly in China (QQ and Miapoi). Looking further, we can also see that the default map coordinates in the config point directly to the Tian’anmen Gate in Beijing, however, most likely this is just a common and symbolic mapping application default for the center of Beijing.

Android implants and a pivot into “evora”

During analysis of the infrastructure related to iOS implant distribution we also found a link directing to Android malware – hxxp://app.hkrevolution[.]club/HKcalander[.]apk (MD5: 77ebb4207835c4f5c4d5dfe8ac4c764d).

According to artefacts found in google cache, this link was distributed through Telegram channels “winuxhk” and “brothersisterfacebookclub”, and Instagram posts in late November 2019 with a message lure in Chinese translated as “The Hong Kong People Calendar APP is online ~~~ Follow the latest Hong Kong Democracy and Freedom Movement. Click to download and support the frontline. Currently only Android version is available.”

Further technical analysis of the packed APK reveals the timestamp of its actual build – 2019-11-04 18:12:33. Also it uses the subdomain, sharing an iOS implant distribution domain, as its c2 server – hxxp://svr.hkrevolution[.]club:8002.

Its code contains a link to another related domain:

Checking this server we found it hosted another related APK:

MD5 fadff5b601f6fca588007660934129eb
URL hxxp://movie.poorgoddaay[.]com/MovieCal[.]apk
C2 hxxp://app.poorgoddaay[.]com:8002
Build timestamp 2019-07-25 21:57:47

The distribution vector remains the same – Telegram channels:

The latest observed APK sample is hosted on a server that is unusual for the campaign context – xxinc-media[.]oss-cn-shenzhen.aliyuncs[.]com. We assume that the actors are taking steps to split the iOS and Android activities between different infrastructure pieces.

MD5 5d2b65790b305c186ef7590e5a1f2d6b
URL hxxps://xxinc-media.oss-cn-shenzhen.aliyuncs[.]com/calendar-release-1.0.1.apk
C2 hxxp://45.134.0[.]123:8002
Build timestamp 2020-01-14 18:30:30

We had not observed any indications of this URL being distributed in the wild yet.

If we take a look closer at the domain poorgoddaay[.]com that not only hosted the malicious APK but also was a C2 for them, we can note that there are two subzones of particular interest to us:

  • zg.poorgoddaay[.]com
  • ns1.poorgoddaay[.]com

We were able to work with partners to pivot into a handful of “evora” samples that use the above two subzones as their C2. Taking that a step further, using our Kaspersky Threat Attribution Engine (KTAE), we can see that the partner samples using those subzones are 99% similar to previous backdoors deployed by SpringDragon.

We are aware of other related and recent “evora” malware samples calling back to these same subnets while targeting organizations in Hong Kong as well. These additional factors help lend at least low confidence to clustering this activity with SpringDragon/LotusBlossom/Billbug.


This particular framework and infrastructure is an interesting example of an agile approach to developing and deploying surveillance framework in Southeast Asia. This innovative approach is something we have seen before from SpringDragon, and LightSpy targeting geolocation at least falls within previous regional targeting of SpringDragon/LotusBlossom/Billbug APT, as does infrastructure and “evora” backdoor use.

Indicators of Compromise

File hashes

9b248d91d2e1d1b9cd45eb28d8adff71 (Jan 10, 2020)
4fe3ca4a2526088721c5bdf96ae636f4 (Feb 7, 2020)

e48c1c6fb1aa6c3ff6720e336c62b278 (Jan 10, 2020)

53acd56ca69a04e13e32f7787a021bb5 (Jan 10, 2020)

184fbbdb8111d76d3b1377b2768599c9 (Jan 10, 2020)
bfa6bc2cf28065cfea711154a3204483 (Feb 7, 2020)
ff0f66b7089e06702ffaae6025b227f0 (Mar 5, 2020)

a981a42fb740d05346d1b32ce3d2fd53 (Jan 10, 2020)
5c69082bd522f91955a6274ba0cf10b2 (Feb 7, 2020)

7b263f1649dd56994a3da03799611950 (Jan 10, 2020)

ae439a31b8c5487840f9ad530c5db391 (Jan 10, 2020)
f70d6b3b44d855c2fb7c662c5334d1d5 (Feb 7, 2020)

f1c899e7dd1f721265cc3e3b172c7e90 (Jan 10, 2020)
ea9295d8409ea0f1d894d99fe302070e (Feb 7, 2020)

c450e53a122c899ba451838ee5250ea5 (Jan 10, 2020)
f761560ace765913695ffc04dfb36ca7 (Feb 7, 2020)

1e12e9756b344293352c112ba84533ea (Jan 10, 2020)
5e295307e4429353e78e70c9a0529d7d (Feb 7, 2020)

187a4c343ff4eebd8a3382317cfe5a95 (Jan 10, 2020)
66d2379318ce8f74cfbd0fb26afc2084 (Feb 7, 2020)

db202531c6439012c681328c3f8df60c (Jan 10, 2020)

3e7094eec0e99b17c5c531d16450cfda (Jan 10, 2020)
06ff47c8108f7557bb8f195d7b910882 (Feb 7, 2020)

35fd8a6eac382bfc95071d56d4086945 (Jan 10, 2020)
7b69a20920d3b0e6f0bffeefdce7aa6c (Feb 7, 2020)

a8b0c99f20a303ee410e460730959d4e (Jan 10, 2020)

8cdf29e9c6cca6bf8f02690d8c733c7b (Jan 10, 2020)

c400d41dd1d3aaca651734d4d565997c (Jan 10, 2020)

Android malware

Past similar SpringDragon evora

Domains and IPs

Implant c2
45.134.1[.]180 (iOS)
45.134.0[.]123 (Android)
app.poorgoddaay[.]com (Android)
svr[.]hkrevolution[.]club (Android)

WebKit exploit landing


Related subdomains

Full Mobile Device Command List


Temp Mails ( is a new free temporary email addresses service. This service provide you random 10 minutes emails addresses. It is also known by names like: temporary mail, disposable mail, throwaway email, one time mail, anonymous email address… All emails received by Tempmail servers are displayed automatically in your online browser inbox.

Cookiethief: a cookie-stealing Trojan for Android – 10 minute mail

We recently discovered a new strain of Android malware. The Trojan (detected as: Trojan-Spy.AndroidOS.Cookiethief) turned out to be quite simple. Its main task was to acquire root rights on the victim device, and transfer cookies used by the browser and Facebook app to the cybercriminals’ server. This abuse technique is possible not because of a vulnerability in Facebook app or browser itself. Malware could steal cookie files of any website from other apps in the same way and achieve similar results.

How can stealing cookies be dangerous? Besides various settings, web services use them to store on the device a unique session ID that can identify the user without a password and login. This way, a cybercriminal armed with a cookie can pass himself off as the unsuspecting victim and use the latter’s account for personal gain.

Package name of the Cookiethief malware — com.lob.roblox, which is similar to that of the Roblox Android gaming client (com.roblox.client), but has nothing in common with Roblox.

Malicious features of Trojan-Spy.AndroidOS.Cookiethief

To execute superuser commands, the malware connects to a backdoor installed on the same smartphone…

…and passes it a shell command for execution.

The backdoor Bood, located at the path /system/bin/.bood, launches the local server…

…and executes commands received from Cookiethief.

On the C&C server we also found a page advertising services for distributing spam on social networks and messengers, so it was not difficult to guess the motive behind the cookie-theft operation.

But there’s still a hurdle for the spammers that prevents them from gaining instant access to accounts just like that. For example, if Facebook detects an atypical user activity, the account may be blocked.

However, during our analysis of Cookiethief, we uncovered another malicious app with a very similar coding style and the same C&C server. The second “product” from (presumably) the same developers (detected as: Trojan-Proxy.AndroidOS.Youzicheng) runs a proxy on the victim’s device.

We believe that Youzicheng is tasked with bypassing the security systems of the relevant messenger or social network using a proxy server on the victim’s device. As a result, cybercriminals’ request to the website will look like a request from a legitimate account and not arouse suspicion.

To implement this method, an executable file is first downloaded.

Then the proxy configuration is requested.

The downloaded file is then run.

By combining these two attacks, cybercriminals can gain complete control over the victim’s account and not raise a suspicion from Facebook. These threats are only just starting to spread, and the number of victims, according to our data, does not exceed 1000, but the figure is growing.

Through the C&C server addresses and encryption keys used, Cookiethief can be linked with such widespread Trojans as Sivu, Triada, and Ztorg. Usually, such malware is either planted in the device firmware before purchase, or it gets into system folders through vulnerabilities in the operating system and then can download various applications into the system. As a result, a persistent backdoor like Bood, along with the auxiliary programs Cookiethief and Youzicheng, can end up on the device.

We detect com.lob.roblox as HEUR:Trojan-Spy.AndroidOS.Cookiethief, org.rabbit as HEUR:Trojan-Proxy.AndroidOS.Youzicheng, and Bood as HEUR:Backdoor.AndroidOS.Bood.a.



Temp Mails ( is a new free temporary email addresses service. This service provide you random 10 minutes emails addresses. It is also known by names like: temporary mail, disposable mail, throwaway email, one time mail, anonymous email address… All emails received by Tempmail servers are displayed automatically in your online browser inbox.

MonitorMinor: vicious stalkerware? | Securelist – 10 minute mail

Updated March 17th, 2020

The other day, our Android traps ensnared an interesting specimen of commercial software that is positioned as a parental control app, but may also be used to secretly monitor family members or colleagues – or, in other words, for stalking. Such apps are often called stalkerware. On closer inspection, we found that this app outstrips all existing software of its class in terms of functionality. Let’s take a look one step at a time.

Modern stalkerware

What is the usual functionality of stalkerware? The most basic thing is to transmit the victim’s current geolocation. There are many such “stalkers”, since various special web resources are used to display coordinates, and they only contain a few lines of code.

Often, their creators use geofencing technology, whereby a notification about the victim’s movements is sent only if they go beyond (or enter) a particular area. In some cases, functions to intercept SMS and call data (spyware that’s able to log them is much less common) are added to the geolocation transmission.

But today, SMS are used mainly for receiving one-time passwords and not much else — their niche has been captured almost entirely by messengers, which these days even facilitate business negotiations. Moreover, they claim to be an alternative to “traditional” voice communication. So any software with tracking/spying functionality worth its salt must be able to intercept data from messengers. The sample we found (assigned the verdict Monitor.AndroidOS.MonitorMinor.c) is a rare piece of monitoring software that could be used for stalking purposes that can do this.

MonitorMinor features

In a “clean” Android operating system, direct communication between apps is prevented by the sandbox, so stalkerware cannot simply turn up and gain access to, say, WhatsApp messages. This access model is called DAC (Discretionary Access Control). When an app is installed on the system, a new account and app directory are created, the latter being accessible only to this account. For example, WhatsApp stores the user’s chat history in the file /data/data/com.whatsapp/databases/msgstore.db, which only the user and WhatsApp itself have access to. Other messengers work in a similar way.

The situation changes if a SuperUser-type app (SU utility) is installed, which grants root access to the system. Exactly how they get on the device — installed at the factory, by a user, or even by malware — is not so important. The main point is that they cause one of the system’s key security mechanisms to cease to exist (in fact, all security systems cease to exist, but it is DAC that we are interested in right now).

It is the presence of this utility that the creators of MonitorMinor are perhaps counting on. By escalating privileges (running the SU utility), it gains full access to data in the following apps:

  • LINE: Free Calls & Messages
  • Gmail
  • Zalo – Video Call
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Kik
  • Hangouts
  • Viber
  • Hike News & Content
  • Skype
  • Snapchat
  • JusTalk

In other words, all the most popular modern communication tools.

Intercepting the device unlock code

MonitorMinor’s functionality is not limited to intercepting data from social networking apps and messengers: using root privileges, it extracts the file /data/system/gesture.key from the device, which contains the hash sum for the screen unlock pattern or the password. This lets the MonitorMinor operator unlock the device, when it’s nearby or when the operator will have physical access to the device the next time. This is the first time we have registered such a function in all our experience of monitoring mobile platform threats.


When MonitorMinor acquires root access, it remounts the system partition from read-only to read/write mode, then copies itself to it, deletes itself from the user partition, and remounts it back to read-only mode. After this “castling” move, the application cannot be removed using regular OS tools. Sure, the option to escalate privileges is not available on all devices, and without root one might assume that the software would be less effective. But not if it’s MonitorMinor.

MonitorMinor features without root

Android is a very user-friendly operating system. It is especially friendly to users with disabilities: with the Accessibility Services API, the phone can read aloud incoming messages and any other text in app windows. What’s more, with the help of Accessibility Services, it is possible to obtain in real time the structure of the app window currently displayed on the smartphone screen: input fields, buttons, their names, etc.

It is this API that the stalkerware uses to intercept events in the above-listed apps. Put simply, even without root, MonitorMinor is able to operate effectively on all devices with Accessibility Services (which means most of them).

WhatsApp chat intercepted using Accessibility Services

A keylogger function is also implemented in this app through this same API. That is, MonitorMinor’s reach is not limited to social networks and messengers: everything entered by the victim is automatically sent to the MonitorMinor servers. The app also monitors the clipboard and forwards the contents. The app also allows its owner to:

  • Control the device using SMS commands
  • View real-time video from the device’s cameras
  • Record sound from the device’s microphone
  • View browsing history in Chrome
  • View usage statistics for certain apps
  • View the contents of the device’s internal storage
  • View the contacts list
  • View the system log

Fragment of an operator web interface demonstrating MonitorMinor’s capabilities


According to KSN statistics, India currently has the largest share of installations of this application (14.71%). In addition, a Gmail account with an Indian name is stitched into the body of MonitorMinor, which hints at its country of origin. That said, we also discovered control panels in Turkish and English.

The second country in terms of usage is Mexico (11.76%), followed by Germany, Saudi Arabia, and the UK (5.88%), separated by only a few thousandths of one percent.

Map of users attacked by MonitorMinor (all attacks), November – December 2019


MonitorMinor is superior to other tracking apps that can be used for stalking purposes in many aspects. It implements all kinds of tracking features, some of which are unique and is almost impossible to detect on the victim’s device. If the device has root access, its operator has even more options available. For example, they can retrospectively view what the victim has been doing on social networks. Note too that the Monitor.AndroidOS.MonitorMinor.c is obfuscated, which means that its creators may be aware of the existence of anti-stalkerware tools and try to counter them.

Yet we should note that the License agreement available on the website, from which the application is distributed, clearly states that users of the application are not allowed to use it for silent monitoring of another person without written consent. Moreover, the authors of the agreement warn that in some countries such actions may be subject to investigation by law enforcement agencies. So, formally, it is hard to deny that the developers of this application took steps to provide information about the potential consequences of unlawful usage of the app.

On the other hand, we can’t see how this information can help potential targets of stalkers that would decide to use this app. It is very intrusive and is able to exist on the target’s device without being visible to its owner, and it can silently harvest practically every bit of the target’s personal communications. Due to the powerful characteristics of this app, we decided to draw attention to it and inform those who defend people from stalkerware of the potential threat it poses. This is not just another parental control application.

The market has plenty of Parental Control solutions that do their job properly without providing the “Parent” with a super set of instruments to track their “kids’” personal life. We are not in the position to teach other developers how to create parental control applications, however, it is our job to let our clients and other parties know when there is something out there that could be used to significantly impede on their privacy.



Temp Mails ( is a new free temporary email addresses service. This service provide you random 10 minutes emails addresses. It is also known by names like: temporary mail, disposable mail, throwaway email, one time mail, anonymous email address… All emails received by Tempmail servers are displayed automatically in your online browser inbox.